{"id":433,"date":"2012-02-10T20:21:56","date_gmt":"2012-02-10T20:21:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/?p=433"},"modified":"2018-09-06T23:25:21","modified_gmt":"2018-09-06T23:25:21","slug":"networking-basics-part-16-the-windows-operating-systems-role-in-networking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/?p=433","title":{"rendered":"Networking Basics: Part 16 &#8211; The Windows Operating System&#8217;s Role in Networking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The role that the Windows Operating System plays in networking.<\/p>\n<p>I received an e-mail message from a reader who wanted to know why  most of the articles in this series have focused on Windows. It was not  so much that the person who sent me the message hated Microsoft, or  preferred Linux, or anything like that, but wondered why Windows was  necessary. As he correctly pointed out, networking has been around since  long before Windows. To make a long story short, I thought that the  message made a good point, so I wanted to take the opportunity to talk  about the role that Windows plays in networking.<\/p>\n<h2>Before I Begin<\/h2>\n<p>Before I get started, there are a couple of  things that I need to say up front. First, I am going to be spending  some time talking about the early days of Windows. There are a lot of  rumors alleging that Microsoft \u201cborrowed\u201d parts of the Windows Operating  System from companies like IBM and Apple. Personally, I do not know if  these rumors are true or not, and to be perfectly frank, I do not really  care. I just wanted to acknowledge the point up front in an effort to  reduce the number of e-mail messages that I receive in response to this  article.<\/p>\n<p>The other thing that I want to clarify up front is that today, every  operating system implements networking in roughly the same way. Although  one operating system might be more efficient than another, the end  result is basically the same. After all, it is no coincidence that  Windows, Macintosh, Linux, and UNIX can all communicate across the same  Internet, using the same protocols.<\/p>\n<p>By writing about Windows, I am not trying to start an operating  system war, as I seem to have inadvertently done so many times in the  past. I just choose to write about Windows because it is the most  commonly used operating system, and articles about Windows would  therefore theoretically benefit the largest number of people, and this  is primarily a Windows focused website.<\/p>\n<h2>What Windows Did for the World<\/h2>\n<p>Now that I have hopefully  appeased most of the haters, let us get down to business. The reason why  Windows became such a dominant operating system was because it solved  two major problems that plagued the IT industry.<\/p>\n<p>The first of these problems is that prior to the creation of Windows,  PCs were relatively difficult to use (at least for the lay person  anyway). Prior to Windows 3.x, most PCs ran a Microsoft operating system  known as MS-DOS. DOS was an acronym that stood for Disk Operating  System.<\/p>\n<p>The DOS operating system actually worked pretty well, but it did have  some serious shortcomings. For starters, the operating system was text  based. This meant that if you wanted to launch an application, you could  not just point and click on an icon, you had to know the command or  commands needed to launch that application. If you wanted to know how  much free disk space you had, you could not just right click on a disk  icon, you had to use the CHKDSK or DIR command.<\/p>\n<p>The average person was intimidated by DOS. After all, using DOS even  for the basics required learning quite a few commands. Many of those  commands could do significant damage to your data if you accidentally  used them incorrectly, so that added to the problem.<\/p>\n<p>There is no denying that PC use was already becoming widespread  before Microsoft introduced the graphical operating system, but Windows  helped to make PCs much easier to use.<\/p>\n<p>The second thing that Windows accomplished was far more important.  Windows provided a level of abstraction that allowed device drivers to  be separated from applications.<\/p>\n<p>In the days of DOS, it was an application developer\u2019s responsibility  to include device drivers as a part of an application. For example, when  I was in high school, the best word processor on the market was a now  defunct product known as PFS Write. One of the things that made PFS  Write such a good product was that it supported numerous printers. Even  so, I recall purchasing a copy and installing it onto my computer, only  to find out that it did not include a driver for my printer. As a  result, I had to buy a new printer, just to be able to use a word  processor.<\/p>\n<p>Keep in mind that my previous printer was not junk. The problem was  that most applications at the time shipped on floppy disks, which had an  extremely limited capacity. As a result, application developers would  typically only include drivers for the most commonly available hardware.  At the time, it was not at all uncommon to find that some applications  (especially video games) did not support particular video cards, sound  cards, etc.<\/p>\n<p>The way that drivers were tied to applications was bad for both  application developers and for consumers. It was bad for application  developers, because they had to spend time writing a zillion device  drivers, which increased development cost and increased the amount of  time that it took to get their product to market. Because an application  could only support a limited set of hardware, the developer inevitably  alienated some would be customers by not supporting their hardware.<\/p>\n<p>Having device drivers tied to applications was bad for consumers as  well. Typically, older hardware was not supported, often forcing  consumers to purchase new hardware along with their new application. At  the same time though, cutting edge hardware was not usually supported  either. Application developers needed to create drivers that would work  for the largest number of people possible, so it was rare for an  application to contain drivers for the latest hardware. Often the new  hardware was backward compatible with device drivers for older hardware,  but it might take years for the cutting edge hardware\u2019s full potential  to be widely utilized by applications.<\/p>\n<p>When Microsoft created Windows, they created an environment in which  any application can interact with any hardware. Sure, applications still  have minimum hardware requirements, but hardware brands and models do  not really matter anymore. For example, if I wanted to print this  document, it would not really matter what kind of printer I have, as  long as I have a printer driver installed.<\/p>\n<p>Windows is built in layers. Every Windows application generates print  jobs in exactly the same way, regardless of what the application is, or  what type of printer the job is being sent to. The Windows operating  system then uses the specified print driver to translate the job into  something that the printer can understand. The actual process is a  little bit more complicated than this, but I wanted to convey the basic  idea rather than going into a lot of boring architectural details.<\/p>\n<p>The point is that abstracting applications from device drivers helps  everyone. Application developers no longer suffer the burden of writing  device drivers, and consumers are now free to use any hardware they want  (so long as it meets minimum standards) without having to worry about  whether or not it will work with a particular application.<\/p>\n<p>As you can see, Microsoft was able to design Windows in a way that  allowed applications to be abstracted from device drivers. In the next  part of this article series, I will continue the discussion by showing  you how this architecture assists with networking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The role that the Windows Operating System plays in networking. I received an e-mail message from a reader who wanted to know why most of the articles in this series have focused on Windows. It was not so much that the person who sent me the message hated Microsoft, or preferred Linux, or anything like [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-networking-stuff"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=433"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2664,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433\/revisions\/2664"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}