{"id":357,"date":"2011-12-08T19:26:12","date_gmt":"2011-12-08T19:26:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/?p=357"},"modified":"2011-12-08T21:38:53","modified_gmt":"2011-12-08T21:38:53","slug":"when-wireless-lans-collide-how-manage-multiple-wlans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/?p=357","title":{"rendered":"When Wireless LANs Collide: How to Manage Multiple WLANs"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Introduction<\/h3>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Too Many Wireless Networks\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/too_many_wlans.jpg\" border=\"1\" alt=\"Too Many Wireless Networks\" width=\"227\" height=\"194\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Wireless networks are wonderful things &#8211; when they work! But many consumers  find that even if they manage to get their WLAN (wireless LAN) working, <strong>keeping<\/strong> it up and running reliably with good performance is often frustrating  and a struggle. Though flaky equipment and improper setup can sometimes  be the cause, all too often the growing popularity of WLAN equipment is  itself the cause of wireless woes.<\/p>\n<div><ins><ins id=\"aswift_0_anchor\"><\/ins><\/ins><\/div>\n<p>In  this article, I&#8217;ll explain the causes of problems in closely-spaced  wireless LANs (and dispel some myths). I&#8217;ll then give you fixes for  common problems, and even tell you what not to waste your time trying.<\/p>\n<p>So, how do you know that you have a problem from neighboring WLANs  and not just something wrong with your own equipment? Take this little  test:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Your &#8220;View Available Wireless Networks&#8221; window shows wireless networks other than your own &#8211; and lots of &#8217;em<\/li>\n<li>You keep losing connection to your AP, even when you&#8217;re in the same room<\/li>\n<li>Your wireless connection seems to crap out around the same time each day&#8230;usually in the late afternoon or early evening<\/li>\n<li>You overhear your neighbor talking about the problems he&#8217;s having with <strong>his<\/strong> wireless LAN<\/li>\n<li>You live in a dorm, apartment building or neighborhood with large homes on small lots and broadband Internet service<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If any of these sound familiar, then you probably should read on. If,  on the other hand, you live out in the boonies where your cell phone  doesn&#8217;t even work and you have to drive over to see your neighbor, then  this article probably isn&#8217;t going to be much help!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>NOTE:<\/strong> Please read references to access points (AP) or wireless routers as applicable to <strong>both<\/strong> kinds of products unless otherwise noted.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h3>What&#8217;s the problem?<\/h3>\n<p>The primary causes of wireless LAN problems in high-density areas are:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>1) Too many users trying to use the same channel.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>2) RF (Radio Frequency) interference from nearby WLANs<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>3) Improper wireless adapter settings<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The first problem is a <strong>capacity<\/strong> issue, i.e. not enough  bandwidth to go around. Simply put, there are too many radios trying to  use the same channel (i.e. frequency) at the same time in the same area.  &#8220;High density&#8221; is a relative term, but if you live in an apartment  building or school dorm, you&#8217;re definitely in this category. And even if  you live in a single-family dwelling, if the distance between your and  your neighbors&#8217; homes is 50 feet or so, and you know the names (SSIDs)  of your neighbors&#8217; wireless networks, you&#8217;re also in this category!<\/p>\n<p>An 802.11g network has a best-case useable bandwidth of around <strong>25Mbps<\/strong>.  802.11n can move this up to anywhere between 50 and 100 Mbps. But if  any 11g clients are also actively using the same radio on an 802.11n  router, throughput for both will be reduced by more than half.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/wireless\/wireless-features\/30224-add-dont-replace-when-upgrading-to-80211n\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Too Much Noise<\/h3>\n<p>The second cause falls into the category of RF-based <strong>interference<\/strong>.  Though you might think of wireless LAN interference only in terms of  2.4GHz cordless phones and microwave ovens, WLAN equipment itself is  becoming another growing &#8211; and perhaps dominant &#8211; category of RF  &#8220;noise&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Every form of communication has to deal with two components: <strong>signal<\/strong>, which is the part that contains the desired information; and <strong>noise<\/strong>,  which is everything else. Key attributes of radio receiver design are  maximizing sensitivity to signal and minimizing sensitivity to noise.<\/p>\n<p>As long as Wi-Fi products receive sufficient signal, the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carrier_sense_multiple_access_with_collision_avoidance\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Carrier Sense Multiple Access\/Collision Avoidance<\/strong><\/a> (CSMA\/CA) mechanism built into the protocol coordinates their communication. This access method &#8211; similar to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carrier_sense_multiple_access_with_collision_detection\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>CSMA\/CD<\/strong><\/a> used in wired Ethernet &#8211; makes sure that only one product transmits at a time, so that the data is understood by all receivers.<\/p>\n<p>But when the radio energy detected by a piece of WLAN gear can&#8217;t be  understood &#8211; even if that energy comes from valid WLAN equipment &#8211; it  turns into noise. Wireless LAN gear does a remarkable job of  differentiating between signal and noise, but not all products are  created equal in this area.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re using 2.4 GHz band equipment, you probably know that your access point has <strong>eleven channels<\/strong> that it can be set to. You may not know, however, that <strong>only three of those channels should be used<\/strong>. The reason for this is illustrated in <strong>Figures 1 and 2<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"2.4 GHz band adjacent channel overlap\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/NTK\/superg_ntk_11b_adjacent_chans_alt.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"2.4 GHz band adjacent channel overlap\" width=\"268\" height=\"122\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 1: 2.4 GHz band adjacent channel overlap<\/h6>\n<p>The yellow shaded area in <strong>Figure 1<\/strong> represents the power from  channel 2&#8217;s signal that overlaps into channel 1&#8217;s main lobe (the largest  &#8220;hump&#8221; and also the frequency band that contains most of the signal&#8217;s  power). Since a significant amount of channel 2&#8217;s main lobe overlaps  into channel 1&#8217;s main lobe (and vice versa), communication on both  channels will suffer. (Note that this effect is the same for any two  adjacent channels, not just Channels 1 and 2.)<\/p>\n<p>Contrast this picture with the situation shown in <strong>Figure 2<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"2.4 GHz band \" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/NTK\/superg_ntk_11b_1_6_11.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"802.11b &quot;non-overlapping&quot; channel overlap\" width=\"450\" height=\"125\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 2: 2.4 GHz band &#8220;non-overlapping&#8221; channel overlap<\/h6>\n<p>This figure has the same scale as <strong>Figure 1<\/strong>, but shows signals in the &#8220;non-overlapping&#8221; channels <strong>1, 6 and 11<\/strong>.  Since the power from each signal doesn&#8217;t magically stop at the 22MHz  2.4 GHz band channel boundaries, there is still overlap between  &#8220;non-overlapping&#8221; channels. But in this case, the yellow shaded area  that represents channel 11&#8217;s power that is overlapping into the main  lobe of channel 6 is at least 30 dB lower (1\/1000) than channel 11&#8217;s  peak power. For most well-designed radios, this 30dB difference between  signal and &#8220;noise&#8221; is sufficient to ensure good rejection of the  adjacent channels&#8217; signals (i.e. noise).<\/p>\n<p>Use of overlapping channels isn&#8217;t the only source of WLAN RF interference. As I&#8217;ll explain later (<strong>What Doesn&#8217;t Help<\/strong>),  some of the techniques that your might be using to &#8220;ignore&#8221; other WLANs  actually can hurt rather than help your own WLAN&#8217;s performance!<\/p>\n<p>The take-away from all this is that not only do you have to deal with  possible problems from microwave ovens and 2.4GHz phones, but  neighboring WLANs themselves can also become interference sources.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/tip_hp.gif\" alt=\"Tip\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> <strong>Tip:<\/strong> Wireless networking management company <strong>Cirond<\/strong> argued that there are actually four channels (1, 4, 8, 11) that can be  used for 802.11b and g with virtually no performance penalty. I  recommend you stick with using Channels 1, 6, and 11 since they are more  likely to be used by neighboring WLANs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The third cause\u2014incorrect settings\u2014is just that. More on that topic later.<\/p>\n<h3>Change Channels<\/h3>\n<p>Now that you understand the primary mechanisms at work, you&#8217;re ready  to move on to ways to combat them. A simple first step is to <strong>change your access point&#8217;s channel.<\/strong> Since Windows XP&#8217;s Wireless Zero Configuration utility is no help in  determining the channels that neighboring wireless LANs are operating  on, you&#8217;ll need to fire up the wireless client utility that came with  your wireless adapter card.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stumbler.net\/\" target=\"_blank\">NetStumbler<\/a> used to be the go-to program for getting a clearer view of your wireless environment. But <a href=\"http:\/\/www.metageek.net\/products\/inssider\" target=\"_blank\">MetaGeek&#8217;s   inSSIDer<\/a> seems to have now taken the lead. It&#8217;s free, works with Windows XP, Vista and 7 (32 and 64-bit) and uses any wireless network card.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"MetaGeek's inSSIDer\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/inssider-small.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"MetaGeek's inSSIDer\" width=\"550\" height=\"462\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 3: MetaGeek&#8217;s inSSIDer<\/h6>\n<p>One you know the lay of the airwaves, the countermeasure is simple.  You&#8217;ll just need to choose a channel &#8211; 1, 6, or 11 &#8211; that is <strong>used by the fewest neighboring APs<\/strong>, has the <strong>lowest signal<\/strong>, is the <strong>least busy<\/strong>, or hopefully all three!<\/p>\n<p>Changing channels is easy, but you have to know how to access your  access point or wireless router&#8217;s setup screens (this info is in your  product&#8217;s setup guide and user manual). As an example, <strong>Figure 4<\/strong> shows the main Setup screen for the <strong>NETGEAR WNDR3700<\/strong>, with the yellow highlight indicating the <strong>SSID<\/strong> settings for the two radios.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"NETGEAR WNDR3700 wireless settings\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/ssid_setting.jpg\" border=\"1\" alt=\"NETGEAR WNDR3700 wireless settings\" width=\"550\" height=\"588\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 4: NETGEAR WNDR3700 wireless settings<\/h6>\n<p>You&#8217;ll probably want to change both settings &#8211; I&#8217;ll explain the how  and why of the SSID setting later. Be sure to Apply, Save or whatever  your product has you do to make the settings stick after you change  them.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, while client utilities can help you count APs and determine their operating channel, they won&#8217;t show you how <strong>busy<\/strong> each of those AP&#8217;s are, i.e. how many clients are associated to them.  For that, you need a handy tool like my personal favorite &#8211; <strong>AirMagnet<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"AirMagnet Handheld showing APs\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/Reviews\/images\/scrnshots\/airmag_aplist.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"AirMagnet Handheld showing APs\" width=\"240\" height=\"320\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 5: AirMagnet Handheld showing APs<\/h6>\n<p><strong>Figure 5<\/strong> shows just one of the many views that AirMagnet can  provide of all in-range wireless equipment. This tree-type view shows  access points (the little towers) and their associated clients (the  little laptops). You can see that there are plenty of idle APs, and with  a few stylus taps, AirMagnet can show the channel they&#8217;re operating on,  too.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, AirMagnet and similar wireless LAN analysis tools are not intended for consumers and are priced  accordingly ($3000 and up). If you&#8217;re handy with Linux, you can try <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kismetwireless.net\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Kismet<\/strong><\/a>,  but otherwise you&#8217;ll have to make do with counting APs and looking at  signal strength to guide you in your choice of new channel.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/attentionsml.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"NOTE!\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\" \/><strong>NOTE:<\/strong> Don&#8217;t bother trying to change the operating channel of your <strong>wireless client<\/strong>.  The operating channel of Infrastructure-based wireless LANs (those that  use access points or wireless routers) is determined by the AP, not the  client. All you need to do is change the AP channel, and its associated  clients will follow.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h3>Duplicate SSIDs<\/h3>\n<p>Finding unused airspace will solve most neighboring LAN problems. But  if that&#8217;s not an option (or you&#8217;ve tried it and you still need help),  you might just need to tell your laptop to not go wandering and stay home!<\/p>\n<p>In its zeal to make wireless networking as easy and automatic as  possible, the default behavior of WinXP&#8217;s built-in Wireless Zero  Configuration utility is very, well, promiscuous. Once you use it to  successfully connect to a wireless LAN with a particular name (i.e.  SSID), it automatically considers that a &#8220;preferred network&#8221; and will  connect your wireless computer to it whenever it comes within range.<\/p>\n<p>This convenient feature becomes a problem, however, in areas where there are <strong>multiple access points with the same name, but that are not part of the same network<\/strong>!  As far as your wireless laptop is concerned, APs with the same name are  part of the same network (this is how wireless LANs with multiple APs  are set up, actually). Since your laptop has no way of knowing that  those other APs with the same SSID as your AP are actually belong to  your <strong>neighbors&#8217;<\/strong> APs, it will at some point try to connect to them, usually when it detects an AP with a stronger signal.<\/p>\n<p>But if your neighbor&#8217;s AP happens to have WEP or WPA encryption  enabled, or is using MAC address filtering (association control), your  laptop won&#8217;t be able to connect. What you&#8217;ll see is your wireless  connection dropping, then (maybe) reconnecting to your own AP (you may  have to rescan for networks and manually reconnect). You may think that  your wireless network has gone haywire, but in truth, your laptop&#8217;s  wireless card is just trying to do its job and keep you connected to the  best signal available.<\/p>\n<p>What makes this situation worse &#8211; by interfering with proper diagnosis of the problem &#8211; is that the <strong>Available Networks<\/strong> part of XP Zero Config <em>doesn&#8217;t show multiple instances of the same network name (SSID)<\/em>. So unless you run the wireless client utility that came with your adapter <strong>and<\/strong> it shows <strong>every<\/strong> AP that it detects, you can only guess at what your wireless client is really seeing.<\/p>\n<p>The good news is that Windows 7 seems to have addressed this issue  and shows multiple instances of the same SSID. And many manufacturers  have helped by having APs and wireless routers generate unique SSIDs,  usually with part of the router&#8217;s MAC address concatenated with the  manufacturer name.<\/p>\n<p>Figure 6 shows inSSIDer&#8217;s view of a few wireless routers that I just  fired up. The only change I made was to set two of the SSIDs on one  EnGenius dual-band concurrent router to &#8220;EnGenius&#8221;. I ran this scan from  a notebook with an Intel WiFi Link 5300 dual-band N client card, so you  can see SSIDs in both bands. InSSIDer found <strong>seven SSID<\/strong>s, including the one duplicate.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/myincludes\/image_page.php?\/images\/stories\/wireless\/wds\/multi_wlan_inssider.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Multiple APs viewed with inSSIDer\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/multi_wlan_inssider_550.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Multiple APs viewed with inSSIDer\" width=\"550\" height=\"371\" \/><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Click to enlarge image\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/enlarge.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Click to enlarge image\" width=\"54\" height=\"16\" align=\"absmiddle\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 6: Multiple APs viewed with inSSIDer<\/h6>\n<p>Figure 7 shows a Win 7 notebook&#8217;s view of the same set of SSIDs.  While all SSIDs are shown, the display is less informative\u2014you don&#8217;t  even get channel information when you mouse over each connection.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Same view with built-in Win 7 Wireless Utility\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/multi_wlan_win7.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Same view with built-in Win 7 Wireless Utility\" width=\"266\" height=\"381\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 7: Same view with built-in Win 7 Wireless Utility<\/h6>\n<p>Finally, for those still using Windows XP, Figure 8 shows that you won&#8217;t see the duplicate SSID.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Same view with Win XP Wireless Zero Config\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/multi_wlan_xp.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Same view with Win XP Wireless Zero Config\" width=\"550\" height=\"413\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 8: Same view with Win XP Wireless Zero Config<\/h6>\n<h3>Making your client stay home<\/h3>\n<p>Fortunately there are two things you can do to keep your wireless clients on their own network. The first is to <strong>change your SSID from its default value and one not used by nearby WLANs<\/strong>.  Choose something unique and that doesn&#8217;t divulge your name or location  (for security&#8217;s sake). Using only letters, numbers, underscores and <strong>no spaces<\/strong> should give you plenty of options for the SSID name.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/tip_hp.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Tip!\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> <strong>TIP:<\/strong> Some APs allow you to set an &#8220;AP Name&#8221;, which has nothing to do with  its SSID, but is used to tell multiple APs apart for management  purposes. So make sure you change your APs <strong>SSID<\/strong> (sometimes called ESSID).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The second step is to <strong>clear the Preferred Network list<\/strong> and make sure connection to non-preferred networks is disabled. Some wireless client utilities refer to this list as <strong>Profiles<\/strong>, but the concept is the same.<\/p>\n<p>With XP, you&#8217;ll find the icon for your wireless adapter in the <strong>Network Connections<\/strong> window (<strong>Start &gt; Settings &gt; Network Connections)<\/strong>. Right-clicking on the icon and selecting Properties should bring up a window similar to <strong>Figure 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Too many &quot;Preferred&quot; networks\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/howto\/wlan_neighbor_wzcfg.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Too many &quot;Preferred&quot; networks\" width=\"367\" height=\"443\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 9: Too many &#8220;Preferred&#8221; networks<\/h6>\n<p>The upper portion of the window lists Available, i.e. currently detected, wireless networks while the lower section lists Preferred networks. Simply <strong>delete every network except yours<\/strong> by selecting them and clicking the <strong>Remove<\/strong> button. Then click the <strong>Advanced<\/strong> button to bring up that window, and make yours look like <strong>Figure 10<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"XP Advanced Wireless Network Properties\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/howto\/wlan_neighbor_wzcfg_adv.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"XP Advanced Wireless Network Properties\" width=\"306\" height=\"220\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 10: XP Advanced Wireless Network Properties<\/h6>\n<p>This will prevent your card from trying to connect to Ad-Hoc networks  (in the unlikely event that any are around), but more importantly  prevent automatic connection to any new wireless LANs that appear in  your neighborhood.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/tip_hp.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Tip!\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> <strong>TIP:<\/strong> If your wireless client is moved to another location where wireless  LANs are present, you should repeat the Preferred Network clean-out when  you return to your normal location.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For Win 7, the process looks different, but does the same thing. You first bring up the <strong>Network and Sharing Center<\/strong> (Figure 11), which you can do from the Network connection tray icon. I&#8217;ve highlighted the <em>Manage wireless networks<\/em> link that you need to click next.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Windows 7 Network and Sharing Center\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/win7_network_center.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Windows 7 Network and Sharing Center\" width=\"550\" height=\"539\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 11: Windows 7 Network and Sharing Center<\/h6>\n<p>The <strong>Manage Wireless Networks<\/strong> window lets you set the network  connection priority and  add and delete wireless networks. Again, make  sure that your network name is unique and <em>at the top of this list<\/em>. You might also want to delete all the other networks that may have made their way into this list. You <em>definitely<\/em> want to delete any networks that are the same as any in-range SSID&#8217;s that you can see!<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Windows 7 Manage Wireless Networks\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/win7_manage_wireless_networks.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Windows 7 Manage Wireless Networks\" width=\"550\" height=\"539\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 12: Windows 7 Manage Wireless Networks<\/h6>\n<p>To reach other wireless controls in Win 7, you need to get to the <strong>Wireless Connection Status<\/strong> window. You can do this by clicking the network connection icon in the  tray, right-clicking the currently-connected network and choosing <em>Status<\/em> to bring up a window like the one in Figure 13.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Windows 7 Wireless Connection Status\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/win7_wireless_connection_status.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Windows 7 Wireless Connection Status\" width=\"367\" height=\"443\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 13: Windows 7 Wireless Connection Status<\/h6>\n<p>Clicking the <em>Wireless Properties<\/em> button will bring up the window shown in Figure 14.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Windows 7 Wireless Network properties\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/win7_wireless_properties.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Windows 7 Wireless Network properties\" width=\"379\" height=\"492\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 14: Windows 7 Wireless Network properties<\/h6>\n<p>The <em>Connect automatically&#8230;<\/em> box shown checked in Figure 14 should be checked <em>only<\/em> for the network you want to connect to. If it&#8217;s checked on other  wireless networks that you want to keep around (Manage Wireless Networks   &#8211; Figure 12) for when you travel or take your notebook to the office, that fine, <em>as long as that network doesn&#8217;t have the same name as any in-range networks!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re using your wireless adapter&#8217;s client utility, check  to  see if has a similar &#8220;preferred network&#8221; capability, and perform a  similar clean-out if possible. Some utilities use &#8220;connection profiles&#8221;,  which store all the settings for connecting to a particular WLAN and  require you to <strong>manually<\/strong> switch among them. You shouldn&#8217;t have to  perform a &#8220;clean-out&#8221; in this case, but you may need to delete unwanted  profiles if your client utility automatically creates them when it  detects new networks and automatically switches among them.<\/p>\n<h3>Other Adapter Settings<\/h3>\n<p>If you&#8217;re on a battery-powered device, you probably know how fast  it can suck down a battery. But wireless adapters can be adjusted to use  less power, mostly by shutting off their transceivers for longer  periods of time. This is called <em>powersaving mode<\/em> (PS).<\/p>\n<div><ins><ins id=\"aswift_0_anchor\"><\/ins><\/ins><\/div>\n<p>Successful  PS requires coordination by both the AP and STA (client). APs must know  the power management state of all connected STAs and save frames for  STAs that are in PS. They must also, however, periodically announce  stations that have frames waiting for them. <a href=\"http:\/\/oreilly.com\/catalog\/9780596100520\/?CMP=OTC-KW7501011010&amp;ATT=802dot112\" target=\"_blank\">Mattew Gast&#8217;s 802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide<\/a>, my go-to reference for all things 802.11, has a complete explanation in <em>Chapter 8: Power Management in Infrastructure Networks<\/em>, which you can <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=9rHnRzzMHLIC&amp;pg=PA188&amp;lpg=PA188&amp;dq=power%2Bmanagement%2Bin%2Binfrastructure%2Bnetworks&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=3wyVFc1dKu&amp;sig=4BK8ThRG_ETIsaETJfXZA1fKjAY&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=eGQjTMubM4L58Aaa3MzHBQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=7&amp;ved=0CDwQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&amp;q=power%20management%20in%20infrastructure%20networks&amp;f=false\" target=\"_blank\">view via Google books<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But sometimes the coordination doesn&#8217;t work well, which can lead to  APs and STAs losing connection. To fix this, you may need to set your  wireless adapter to stay awake longer or not use PS mode at all.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, you may have to hunt around for the settings. First  stop is your wireless client adapter&#8217;s properties, where you may find a power saving mode setting among the Advanced properties. Win 7 &#8220;helpfully&#8221; moves these settings to the <strong>Power Options Control Panel<\/strong>, but then buries them a few levels down.<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ll need to bring up the <strong>Power Options<\/strong> Control Panel, then the click the <em>Change Plan Settings<\/em> link for the currently-selected power plan to bring up the screen in Figure 15. Then click the <em>Change advanced power settings<\/em> link I&#8217;ve highlighted.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Windows 7 Edit Power Plan settings\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/win7_power_plan.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Windows 7 Edit Power Plan settings\" width=\"550\" height=\"452\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 15: Windows 7 Edit Power Plan settings<\/h6>\n<p>That will finally bring you to the <strong>Power Options Advanced Setting<\/strong> window. Scroll until you find <strong>Wireless Adapter Settings<\/strong> as shown in Figure 16 and change the option to <em>Maximum Performance<\/em> if it already isn&#8217;t. Make sure you change the option for both <em>On battery<\/em> and <em>Plugged In<\/em> modes. It&#8217;s probably a good idea to reboot both the computer and the  wireless router after making the change to make sure that old state  information gets cleared out.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Changing Wireless Adapter Power settings in Win 7\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images\/stories\/wireless\/howto_wlan_collide\/win7_wireless_power_properties.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Changing Wireless Adapter Power settings in Win 7\" width=\"408\" height=\"435\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 16: Changing Wireless Adapter Power settings in Win 7<\/h6>\n<p>If this fixes the problem, but shortens your battery life too much, you can then try backing off the settings to <em>Low Power Saving<\/em>, <em>Medium Power Saving<\/em>, etc.<\/p>\n<h3>Survey the possibilities<\/h3>\n<p>If you can&#8217;t find a clear channel and still have problems after  locking your clients down so that they don&#8217;t go straying to other WLANs,  it&#8217;s time to see if you can do something about all the unwanted signals  bombarding your poor little WLAN, i.e. reduce the RF noise. This is an  area where understanding the problem is especially important before  implementing a solution and that means you&#8217;ll need something to measure  signal strength to help you perform a site survey.<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;site survey&#8221; is just a fancy term for walking around with  something that can measure wireless signal strength and recording what  you see. You can do this with your wireless laptop,  provided that its client application has the ability to show all  in-range APs, their channels and some indication of signal strength.<\/p>\n<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter whether the signal indicator reads in %, dBm, or  no units at all, or whether it measures signal strength, signal quality  or both, since you&#8217;ll be looking mainly for <strong>changes<\/strong> in whatever  indicator you use. It&#8217;s also helpful if the client utility has a  fast-responding, real-time signal indicator for the AP that it&#8217;s  connected to, and even better if it can plot the signal strength over  time.<\/p>\n<p>Once again, inSSIDer comes to the rescue providing both numerical  RSSI readings and nice plots of in-range networks.<\/p>\n<p>Once you have your signal measurement tool, take it to your problem  location(s) and see what it can see. Since you&#8217;ve already addressed the  SSID-related problems (right?), you&#8217;re mainly looking for the signal  levels and channels of neighboring APs. The APs most likely to be  causing you grief are those on the same <em>or nearby<\/em> channels and with signal levels greater than or equal to that of your own AP.<\/p>\n<p>Folks who use channels other than 1, 6 and 11, thinking that they  are outsmarting the crowd actually hurt both themselves and neighboring  networks. More on this in the &#8220;What Doesn&#8217;t Help&#8221; section.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes, though, the problem isn&#8217;t wireless networks, but  non-WiFi signals in the same band. Other things that use the 2.4 GHz  band are wireless cameras, baby monitors,  cordless phones and microwave ovens. Note that some &#8220;5.8 GHz&#8221; phones  actually also use the 2.4 GHz band! The only Wi-Fi safe phones are DECT  (for non-US users) or DECT 6.0 (for US) based. They use a frequency band  outside the Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz band, so can&#8217;t interfere.<\/p>\n<p>These things won&#8217;t show up using a site survey tool that can  interpret only Wi-Fi signals. To see non-WiFi RF, you need a spectrum  analysis tool like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.metageek.net\/products\/wi-spy-24i\" target=\"_blank\">MetaGeek&#8217;s $99 Wi-spy 2.4i<\/a>.  This very handy tool covers only the 2.4 GHz band. But that&#8217;s where  most problems lie anyway. If you do perform a spectrum analysis make  sure that you run the analysis over a long enough period, especially if  your problem is intermittent!<\/p>\n<p>Once you understand the wireless environment your client is operating in, you&#8217;re ready to take steps to change it.<\/p>\n<p>But my general advice is to focus on solutions that reduce  interference from neighboring WLANs vs. boosting your own signal and  creating a problem for someone else. Many times a little aluminum  screening, intelligent use of directional antennas and <em>just relocating your AP<\/em> can go a long way.<\/p>\n<h3>5 GHz<\/h3>\n<p>Sometimes, it&#8217;s just time to move on. If your efforts at battling  2.4 GHz band interference are proving to be futile, consider moving to  the quieter 5 GHz band. This is much easier now than when 802.11a was  the only 5 GHz option.<\/p>\n<p>Single radio dual-band 802.11n routers allow you to  operate in <em>either<\/em> band and <em>simultaneous<\/em> dual-band routers can support clients in both bands at the same time because they have two radios.<\/p>\n<p>The downside of moving to 5 GHz is that your wireless network won&#8217;t  reach as far as it does when set to use the 2.4 GHz band. The other  negative is that you&#8217;ll need to switch to dual-band adapters in order to  use the 5 GHz band.<\/p>\n<p>If you can live with these tradeoffs (or set up a multiple-AP WLAN), this might be the way to go for you.<\/p>\n<h3>Social Engineering<\/h3>\n<p>As much as you may hate to admit it, you may not be able to solve  your wireless problems by yourself. Since the heart of the problem is  caused by lack of coordination (and communication) among users trying to  run a number of wireless LANs in too small an area, the most effective  solution would be to apply the design techniques used in large multi-AP  WLANs.<\/p>\n<div><ins><ins id=\"aswift_0_anchor\"><\/ins><\/ins><\/div>\n<p>You  may be surprised at the willingness of people to work together to solve  a common problem\u2014especially if they don&#8217;t really have to do much. Put  up a sign and call a meeting of your apartment building, dorm, or  neighborhood. If you&#8217;ve got the a WLAN problem, chances are others do  too.<\/p>\n<p>Once you&#8217;ve got the interested parties together, the main order of business is to see if you can <strong>work out a satisfactory channel assignment scheme<\/strong>.  If there are only three APs involved, the job is pretty simple. But if  you&#8217;re dealing with more APs, you&#8217;ll have to put in a more effort.<\/p>\n<p>Make a diagram of the APs as close to scale as you can get it. Once  you have the APs located, it&#8217;s just a matter of juggling channel  assignments so that <strong>APs using the same channels have the lowest signal strength with respect to each other.<\/strong> Since signal strength is primarily related to distance, a practical approximation of this rule is to <strong>locate same-channel APs as far apart as possible<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In some cases, building construction and other RF-unfriendly  obstacles like trees, water, screens, etc. may allow you to bend this  &#8220;farthest-distance&#8221; rule a bit. In multi-story situations, be sure to  think in three dimensions because radio waves travel in all directions!<\/p>\n<p>Once you have your channels assigned, but sure to <strong>assign unique SSIDs to each AP<\/strong>.  Though you want to treat the APs as one big WLAN from a channel  assignment point of view, you still want multiple, separate WLANs from  an operational point of view. Unique SSIDs will keep clients from trying  to roam where they&#8217;re unwanted.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, if you find that your neighbors are unfamiliar with the  wonders of WEP \/ WPA, MAC address association control (filtering) and  other WLAN security features, help them get that set up too. With the  problem of wireless-security throughput essentially gone from  current-generation WLAN equipment, there&#8217;s no reason to run wide-open  WLANs if you don&#8217;t want to.<\/p>\n<p>Use <strong>WPA2 \/ AES<\/strong> security with a strong password if you can, i.e. all your devices support it. You especially want to  use WPA2 \/ AES if you&#8217;re running 802.11n gear, since you&#8217;ll get only  802.11g speeds (54 Mbps maximum link rate, around 20 Mbps best-case real  throughput) if you use WEP or WPA \/ TKIP.<\/p>\n<h3>What Doesn&#8217;t Help<\/h3>\n<p>When faced with a wireless LAN that won&#8217;t behave, people will try  most anything in search of a cure. But some &#8220;solutions&#8221; don&#8217;t really  help and can actually hurt your (and your neighbors&#8217;) WLANs performance.  Let&#8217;s look at some &#8220;solutions&#8221; commonly suggested.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Turning on WEP, WPA, WPA2 \/ Using authentication<\/strong><br \/>\nEncryption methods such as WEP and WPA or using one of the many  802.1x authentication methods will keep unwanted clients from  associating with your wireless LAN, but not from trying! Preventing  association keeps clients from using significant amounts of your WLAN&#8217;s  bandwidth, but association attempts &#8211; especially in areas with many  wireless clients &#8211; can still cause performance to degrade.<\/p>\n<p>Put another way, use of encryption doesn&#8217;t do anything to the radio  signal itself, but only to the information it is carrying. So while I  recommend enabling WPA2  for security reasons, it doesn&#8217;t do anything to  reduce the effect of too many radios in too small a space.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Turning off SSID broadcast<\/strong><br \/>\nIt&#8217;s not the security precaution that some articles make it out to be, and it won&#8217;t really help keep <strong>your<\/strong> clients from trying to associate with other wireless LANs. But turning off the broadcast of <strong>your<\/strong> AP&#8217;s SSID could help your <em>neighbors&#8217;<\/em> clients to stay on their own WLAN. But again, <strong>change your default SSID<\/strong>, too, because if your neighbor&#8217;s laptop detected and saved it in <em>its<\/em> &#8220;Preferred network&#8221; list at some point, it will still look for it during its association attempts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Selecting 11g-only or 11n-only mode; Disabling &#8220;protection&#8221;<\/strong><br \/>\nOwners of 802.11g and N APs  may have a few other knobs to fiddle  with, depending on the controls they expose. Some  APs allow disabling  of the 802.11b &#8220;Protection&#8221; mechanism that enables slower 11b clients to  interoperate with faster 11g APs. And 11n routers have similar controls  that control backward-compatibility features for 11g.<\/p>\n<p>The only thing shutting off these protection mechanisms will do,  however, is negatively affect the performance of your WLAN. If your AP  can&#8217;t &#8220;hear&#8221; your slower clients that are trying to communicate with it,  they won&#8217;t be able to connect. And the clients will still be generating  traffic as they constantly try to seek out an AP to associate with.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Boosting your signal<\/strong><br \/>\nSignal boosting  at best solves half the problem, since it can only  help a client to &#8220;hear&#8221; an AP better and not vice-versa. Though I have  to admit that boosting <em>might<\/em> help keep your client from straying by providing a stronger signal to latch onto, I would  use this only as a <strong>last resort<\/strong>. Solving a problem by passing it on to someone else (your neighbor) isn&#8217;t really a solution.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Using Channel Bonding<br \/>\n<\/strong>Atheros&#8217; Super-G was the first bandwidth-hogging<strong> <\/strong>&#8220;channel  bonding&#8221; technique, and 802.11n has 40 MHz mode baked into the standard.  Neither should be used in crowded 2.4 GHz band WiFi environments  because there simply isn&#8217;t enough available bandwidth.<\/p>\n<p>While you may think that you are drowning out neighboring WLANs,  you&#8217;re just raising the RF noise level,  causing problems for everyone.  Leave your N router&#8217;s defaults alone and use only 20 MHz bandwidth mode  in 2.4 GHz.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Using Channels other than 1, 6 and 11 in 2.4 GHz<\/strong><br \/>\nLet&#8217;s bring back an earlier picture to show why this doesn&#8217;t help.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"2.4 GHz band adjacent channel overlap - again\" src=\"http:\/\/www.smallnetbuilder.com\/images_old\/myimages\/NTK\/superg_ntk_11b_adjacent_chans_alt.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"2.4 GHz band adjacent channel overlap - again\" width=\"268\" height=\"122\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Figure 17: 2.4 GHz band adjacent channel overlap &#8211; again<\/h6>\n<p>If you&#8217;re using Channel 1 and your neighbor is using Channel 2,  you&#8217;re both putting plenty of power into each other&#8217;s channel. Even the  best receivers have difficulty dealing with this level of &#8220;adjacent  channel interference&#8221;. Whatever a receiver can&#8217;t understand, ends up as  &#8220;noise&#8221;, which can reduce performance.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, when both your WLANs use the same channel, the  CSMA\/CA mechanism described earlier, as well as other Wi-Fi coordination  techniques, can operate as intended. Although you both will be  contending for a share of the same spectrum (and bandwidth), your  requests can be coordinated for most efficient sharing. In other words,  you may not get the speed you want, but you&#8217;ll get reliable operation.<\/p>\n<h3>Closing Thoughts<\/h3>\n<p>The 802.11 protocol  at the heart of Wi-Fi  is amazingly robust and  capable of supporting dozens, if not hundreds of stations in a given  area. The key to successful operation, however, is <strong>cooperation<\/strong>, not competition.<\/p>\n<p>The old saw of &#8220;thinking globally, and acting locally&#8221; really is the  best approach to having multiple wireless LANs operate successfully. Now  that you know how, get out there and lead your wireless neighborhood to  wireless networking harmony! and Geek on \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction Wireless networks are wonderful things &#8211; when they work! But many consumers find that even if they manage to get their WLAN (wireless LAN) working, keeping it up and running reliably with good performance is often frustrating and a struggle. Though flaky equipment and improper setup can sometimes be the cause, all too often [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-wifi-101"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=357"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":365,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357\/revisions\/365"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microsoftgeek.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}